/* ----------------------------------------------- Blogger Template Style Name: Rounders 3 Designer: Douglas Bowman URL: www.stopdesign.com Date: 27 Feb 2004 ----------------------------------------------- */

Sunday, February 04, 2007

Templeton Foundation Bashes Intelligent Design

The Templeton Foundation is well known for its attempts to harmonize science and religion. It has also been criticized recently for 'supporting the intelligent design movement'. In an editorial letter to the LA times, Pamela Thompson rejects the assertions. Here is a copy of the letter:

"Testing the role of trust and values in financial decisions" (Jan. 21) incorrectly describes the John Templeton Foundation as having been an early supporter of the political movement known as "intelligent design."

We do not believe that the science underpinning the intelligent-design movement is sound, we do not support research or programs that deny large areas of well-documented scientific knowledge, and the foundation is a nonpolitical entity and does not engage in or support political movements.

The foundation has provided tens of millions of dollars in support of research academics who are critical of the anti-evolution intelligent-design position.

For almost a decade, the foundation has been a major supporter of a substantial program of the American Assn. for the Advancement of Science. One of the program's chief activities has been to inform the public of the weakness of the intelligent-design position on modern evolutionary biology.

In the past we have given grants to scientists who have gone on to identify themselves as members of the intelligent-design community. We understand that this could be misconstrued by some to suggest that we implicitly support the movement, but this was not our intention at the time, nor is it today.

Pamela Thompson

Vice president, communications

John Templeton Foundation

I have been criticized repeatedly by ID supporters who argue that ID is not a political or social reform movement. I don't appear to be alone! No matter how they spin it, this has to be an embarrassment to the ID folk. I would be happy to 'teach the controversy' around Intelligent Design. I would phrase the controversy as follows:

Should we support political movements aimed at social reform via the establishment of a theocracy?


Joe Meert


At 2:18 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thanks Joe.
I never heard of the foundation before , being British, and am releived that such a organisation can seperate the wheat from the chaff when it gets to the nitty gritty - in this case at least ;)

At 9:33 AM, Blogger Hermagoras said...


Thompson writes that Templeton has "given grants to scientists who have gone on to identify themselves as members of the intelligent-design community." But Dembski's CV claims that he was given $100 grand from Templeton in 2000 -- after he'd published his first Intelligent Design Creationism (IDC) book. Either Templeton is rightly embarrassed about the Dembski's IDC hackery, Dembski didn't "come out" as an IDC person until he'd scored the money, or Dembski's CV is wrong.

At 10:02 AM, Blogger Unknown said...

His CV is correct. Let's see what the folks at Templeton have to say about it.


Joe Meert


Post a Comment

<< Home

Locations of visitors to this page